Subject: Re: [htdig] server_aliases
From: Malcolm Austen (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 07:56:06 PDT
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
+ It is for this very reason, that DNS aliases are not port specific,
+ that you must specify the port number explicitly if you're not
+ using the default! Consider this: http://www.stuff.com:80/ and
+ http://www.stuff.com:8000/ may be two completely different servers with
+ completely different sets of documents. If server_aliases treated
+ them as equivalent by default, it would be a big mistake. If you're
+ not using port 80 for your http servers, you must specify so explicitly
+ wherever you point to those servers, whether in server_aliases, start_url,
+ limit_urls_to, local_urls, and everywhere else.
I never anticipated that
would map aaa:8000 into bbb:80
but I did anticipate that it would map both
aaa:80 into bbb:80
and aaa:8000 into bbb:8000
+ I don't know where this clarification you're requesting should go -
+ it's not specific or unique to any one attribute.
I was only seeing this matter as specific to server_aliases which you are
saying only works at the combined IPname:port level and can't be used at
the plain IPname level which might be expected from its usage to solve
duplications arising from simple DNS aliases.
In the absence of a clarification I still see a perfectly legitimate
interpretation that, in the example above, all ports on aaa would be
mapped to the corresponding port on bbb.
To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
You will receive a message to confirm this.
List archives: <http://www.htdig.org/mail/menu.html>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 08:00:08 PDT