Subject: Re: [htdig] irrelevant pages in search
From: Geoff Hutchison (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Nov 27 1999 - 12:57:30 PST
At 10:54 AM +0100 11/18/99, Dave wrote:
>Try it out at:
>Words I have tried include "buskett" (results 2/3/6/10 are
>irrelevant, i.e. 40% from the 1st page!)
I tried it out when you first sent the message and again now--I see
that a few of the results are irrelevant, but I'm not so sure all of
those you mention are irrelevant. At the least, I can see why they're
You don't mention how many pages you have in your database or how
closely related they are. Offhand, I think some of your "irrelevant"
pages are scoring highly because they have a high backlink weight.
You might try lowering the backlink_factor
This factor weights "importance" of pages, essentially as a ratio
between the number of links pointing to a page divided by the number
of links on the page. (The ratio helps to remove "link farms" which
often have many links to them.)
Hope that helps,
Williams Students Online
To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
You will receive a message to confirm this.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Nov 27 1999 - 13:10:06 PST