Subject: Re: [htdig3-dev] Do we need an all.html file in htdoc?
From: Geoff Hutchison (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Sep 11 2000 - 15:31:58 PDT
At 5:14 PM -0500 9/11/00, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
>Should cf_generate.pl be changed to make an exception for this, or would
>it make more sense to actually have an all.html that lists all programs
>with a brief summary description of each and a link to its documentation?
>I favour the latter, but I don't have the time to write it.
Fooey. I made the exception when it generates cf_byprog.html, but I
agree with your comments about howitworks.html and using it for
"all.html" I'll take out the exception when modifying it.
>describes the old function of the htmerge utility. It also doesn't
>list all programs, especially the newer ones, but I guess that wasn't
>its original purpose. Still, maybe some of the tools should be mentioned.
Well, almost all the documentation will require updating and careful
checking to make sure it's correct. I mentioned a few of the problems
in the STATUS file. But I think it would be a good idea to give
blurbs of the various new programs so people can see an overview of
what's available now.
So I guess my question would be whether we want howitworks.html and
all.html to be the same thing or different? My vote would probably be
for the former, though CVS doesn't handle symbolic links well.
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
You will receive a message to confirm this.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Sep 11 2000 - 15:47:02 PDT