Subject: Re: [htdig3-dev] differences in local_urls_only action between
From: Gilles Detillieux (grdetil@scrc.umanitoba.ca)
Date: Thu Mar 02 2000 - 07:07:26 PST
According to Geoff Hutchison:
> At 11:33 AM -0600 2/23/00, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> >What do all of you think is preferable? On the one hand, the name does
> >seem to imply that only local urls should be dug, so Geoff's approach
> >does make sense. However, my approach gives you more flexibility in that
>
> Yes, but with the scope of the new server and URL-dependent config, I
> felt this was the right way to go. Anyone who wanted to set non-local
> indexing could do so and people wouldn't get confused as to the
> purpose of the attribute.
>
> My $0.02 at least...
Good point. I was forgetting about the new scoping capability in 3.2.
Right now, local_urls_only is only interpretted globally, but it should
probably be interpretted at the server scope, so you could set it on a
server by server basis if you wanted to.
-- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <grdetil@scrc.umanitoba.ca> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766 Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to htdig3-dev-unsubscribe@htdig.org You will receive a message to confirm this.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Mar 02 2000 - 07:12:37 PST