Re: [htdig3-dev] bad_word_list (continued #2)

Subject: Re: [htdig3-dev] bad_word_list (continued #2)
Date: Thu Feb 03 2000 - 14:25:07 PST

> The code also doesn't seem to make use of WORD_NORMALIZE_NUMBER. Does it
> matter? Right now, numbers are rejected as WORD_NORMALIZE_NOALPHA if
> allow_numbers is false. However, I think the individual status bits are
> only checked when explaining why entries from bad_word_list are rejected.
> So, I don't think there's much point to having a WORD_NORMALIZE_NUMBER
> bit.

 I agree. If you'd like to remove it, I see no problem. It would be nice
to differenciate NOALPHA and NUMBER but since it's not a bug we might as
well kill the flag so that nobody is misleaded.

     Thanks for the analysis :-)

		Loic Dachary

24 av Secretan 75019 Paris Tel: 33 1 42 45 09 16 e-mail: URL:

------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to You will receive a message to confirm this.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Feb 03 2000 - 13:05:08 PST