Gilles Detillieux (grdetil@scrc.umanitoba.ca)
Mon, 19 Jul 1999 11:56:57 -0500 (CDT)
According to loic@ceic.com:
> It occurs to me that it is more portable to use automake. There was
> complex support for 'include Makefile.config' in Makefile.in (BSDI
> does it otherwise) that was removed because automake handles the
> inclusion.
That opens up a whole new can of worms. Either we'll have to make
distributions ahead of time for specific platforms, or we'll have to
require everyone who wants to compile htdig on their system to have the
correct version of automake on their system. I don't know how well
that would go over. If automake is to be required only for making
the distribution, as had been discussed previously, then we want the
Makefiles it generates to be as portable as possible.
-- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <grdetil@scrc.umanitoba.ca> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/~grdetil Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Phone: (204)789-3766 Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) Fax: (204)789-3930 ------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to htdig3-dev@htdig.org containing the single word "unsubscribe" in the SUBJECT of the message.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Jul 19 1999 - 09:15:03 PDT