Re: [htdig3-dev] shared libraries


Geoff Hutchison (ghutchis@wso.williams.edu)
Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:51:28 -0400


loic@ceic.com wrote:
> Ok, I had a look at it. Maybe we should suggest to sleepycat
> to switch to libtool. Building a shared lib for db in the present
> conditions will require quite a lot of work.

That's not a bad idea, though it's obviously out of our control.

> If the idea is to switch to a SQL database in the short term,
> I wonder if it's worthwhile.

I don't want to go down the road of *depending* on a SQL database. Right
now the Database code is still abstracted enough that the Mac port by
Tenon systems is still using the GDBM database. If I had my kicks, it
would check up on a variety of databases in the configure script and use
whatever was installed. This is along the lines of the Perl DBI code,
but would ultimately make a lot of people happy, even if it was limited
to a set of databases (e.g. GDBM?, Berkeley, mySQL, mSQL, ...)

-Geoff
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
htdig3-dev@htdig.org containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Jul 16 1999 - 12:08:35 PDT