Geoff Hutchison (ghutchis@wso.williams.edu)
Wed, 5 May 1999 11:03:39 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 5 May 1999, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> into the list of patterns makes sense. I also think they're "safe",
> in that you're not likely to use parentheses normally in a StringMatch
> pattern for URL pattern matching.
OK, parentheses it is. If using parens keeps the original meaning intact
(I believe it does also).
> more "m", you'd need to say "gdbmm*", or for some regex parsers "gdbm+".
> I think what you intended was "gdbm.*", to get 0 or more occurrences of
> any character after "gdbm".
Yes, you're right. I think I may change the behavior slightly. Personally,
I think a regex fuzzy should match only if the words match the regex
*exactly*. As it stands now, words match if the regex matches part of the
word.
Thus even gdbm.* would match "dbwordsgdbm" which is IMHO unexpected.
-Geoff
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
htdig3-dev@htdig.org containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed May 05 1999 - 08:12:54 PDT