Hans-Peter Nilsson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Fri, 2 Apr 1999 13:25:49 -0500 (EST)
> From: Gilles Detillieux <email@example.com>
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> But, DocHead doesn't seem to be accessed anywhere
> in code that isn't already accessing docdb, which makes sense, as it's
> currently a field in docdb records. So, it seems to me that if you
> handle the new dochead db in much the same way as the existing docdb,
> that shouldn't introduce too much overhead or complications. Currently,
> docdb is opened once in each of the programs, so why not open dochead db
> at the same time, and leave it open until processing is done? Maybe even
> write it as a sub-class of DocumentDB?
If the DocHead database is moved into DocumentDB as a sub-database, then
the opening and read/write problems could probably be solved much the same
way I changed the handling of db.docs.index for the index-on-DocID change.
Or maybe I missed something preventing that.
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
email@example.com containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the SUBJECT of the message.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri Apr 02 1999 - 10:46:42 PST